Insanity on Trial
“Insanity on Trial” by Norman J. Finkel, published by Springer US on September 30, 2011, is a softcover reprint of the original 1st edition from 1988, comprising 398 pages. This book explores the complexities surrounding the insanity defense debate, tracing its historical roots from the infamous case of Daniel M’Naghten in 1843 to the modern implications following John Hinckley’s actions. Finkel examines how these events have sparked widespread public and legal discourse, highlighting the ongoing challenges and controversies associated with defining and adjudicating insanity in the legal system.
Readers will find a thorough analysis of the societal and judicial responses to the insanity defense, as well as the evolving perceptions of mental illness within the context of criminal responsibility. The book delves into the reactions from various stakeholders, including the media, lawmakers, and mental health professionals, as they grapple with the implications of insanity acquittals. By revisiting historical parallels and contemporary cases, Finkel provides a critical examination of the legal and psychological dimensions of this contentious issue, making it a significant contribution to the field of psychology.
Official synopsis Publisher
The insanity defense debate has come full circle, again. The current round began when John Hinckley opened fire; in 1843, it was Daniel M’Naghten who pulled the trigger; the “acts” of both would-be “insanity acquittees” provoked the press, the populace, a President, and a Queen to expressions of outrage, and triggered Congress, the House of Lords, judges, jurists, psychologists, and psychiatrists to debate this most maddening matter. “Insanity” -which has historically been surrounded by defenses, defen ders, and detractors-found itself once again under siege, on trial, and undergoing rigorous cross-examination. Treatises were written on the sub ject, testimony was taken, and new rules and laws were adopted. The dust has settled, but it has not cleared. What is clear to me is that we have got it wrong, once again. The “full circle” analogy and historical parallel to M’Naghten (1843) warrant some elaboration. Hinckley’s firing at the President, captured by television and rerun again and again, rekindled an old debate regarding the allegedly insane and punishment (Caplan, 1984; Maeder, 1985; Szasz, 1987), a debate in which the “insanity defense” is centrally situated. The smolderings ignited anew when the Hinckley (1981) jury brought in its verdict-“not guilty by reason of insanity” (NGRI).
FAQ
What is “Insanity on Trial” about?
Who is the author of “Insanity on Trial”?
When was “Insanity on Trial” published?
What is the ISBN for “Insanity on Trial”?
What are the book details (language, pages, edition)?
