Debating Same-Sex Marriage

Debating Same-Sex Marriage by John Corvino, published by OUP USA on July 5, 2012, is a comprehensive examination of the ongoing discourse surrounding same-sex marriage. This 296-page book presents a structured dialogue between Corvino, a philosopher and advocate for LGBTQ+ rights, and Maggie Gallagher, a columnist and co-founder of the National Organization for Marriage. Through a “point/counterpoint” format, the authors explore fundamental questions about marriage, its societal roles, and the implications of legal recognition for same-sex unions.
Readers will find a thorough analysis of the arguments for and against same-sex marriage, addressing topics such as the purpose of marriage, the state’s involvement in marital recognition, and the potential effects on family structures and child welfare. The book delves into the philosophical and political dimensions of the debate, making it relevant for those interested in social science, law, and LGBTQ+ studies. Corvino advocates for the recognition of same-sex marriage as a means to promote stable households, while Gallagher raises concerns about the implications for traditional views on marriage and family. This edition serves as a valuable resource for anyone seeking to understand the complexities of this significant social issue.
Official synopsis Publisher
As the uproar over the recent New York State law demonstrates, same-sex marriage is a perennial hot-button issue, certain to impact the 2012 election. Debating Same-Sex Marriage provides a useful roadmap to both sides of this contentious matter. Taking a “point/counterpoint” approach, John Corvino (a philosopher and a prominent gay advocate) and Maggie Gallagher (a nationally syndicated columnist and co-founder of the National Organization for Marriage) consider key questions about the institution itself: What is marriage for? Is marriage meant to be a gendered institution? Why is the state in the business of sanctioning marriage? Where do the needs of children fit in? Will legalization of same-sex marriage lead to legalization of polygamy? Corvino argues that society should support same-sex marriage because of its interest in supporting stable households for all its members, gay and straight alike. Gallagher argues that government recognition of same-sex unions as marriages will disconnect marriage from its key public mission furthering responsible procreation, while stigmatizing traditional views of sex, marriage and family as bigotry. Both agree that the issue deserves thoughtful, rigorous engagement.
Publisher
Topics
FAQ
What is “Debating Same-Sex Marriage” about?
Who is the author of “Debating Same-Sex Marriage”?
When was “Debating Same-Sex Marriage” published?
What is the ISBN for “Debating Same-Sex Marriage”?
What are the book details (language, pages, edition)?
