Comparative Analysis of Biosurveillance Methodologies

Comparative Analysis of Biosurveillance Methodologies by David M. Kempisty, published by BiblioScholar on November 19, 2012, is a detailed examination of biological readiness initiatives in the context of threats posed by Chemical, Biological, Nuclear, Radiological, or High Yield Explosive (CBRNE) events in the United States. This 110-page work presents a comparison of two methodologies: the established BioWatch system, which has been operational since June 2003, and a developing project known as “A Hot Idea.” The book provides insights into how these methodologies function and their implications for emergency preparedness.
Readers will find a thorough analysis of the BioWatch system, which collects air samples across 31 cities to detect harmful biological agents, and contrasts it with “A Hot Idea,” which leverages the body’s immune response to identify biological threats through temperature monitoring. This comparative study highlights the expected timelines for emergency response actions and the potential advantages of early detection methods. The book is written in English and serves as a resource for those interested in education and teaching related to biosurveillance and public health preparedness.
Official synopsis Publisher
Threats of Chemical, Biological, Nuclear, Radiological, or High Yield Explosive (CBRNE) events in the United States have caused the implementation of improved preparedness initiatives. This paper focuses on biological readiness initiatives, and compares two methodologies; one already fielded called BioWatch and another developing project, called “A Hot Idea.” BioWatch, a biosurveillance methodology operating since June 2003, collects air samples in 31 cities across the United States on filter paper that is analyzed for the presence of harmful biological agents. The time from biological release until emergency response actions are initiated is expected to be 27-36 hours. “A Hot Idea” uses the body’s immune response to identify the presence of harmful biological agents. An increase in temperature is the body’s response to inoculation with a foreign agent. Detecting a temperature increase, using infrared thermographers, in a statistically significant portion of population would allow earlier identification of a biological release and thereby accelerate initiation of response actions.
FAQ
What is “Comparative Analysis of Biosurveillance Methodologies” about?
Who is the author of “Comparative Analysis of Biosurveillance Methodologies”?
When was “Comparative Analysis of Biosurveillance Methodologies” published?
What is the ISBN for “Comparative Analysis of Biosurveillance Methodologies”?
What are the book details (language, pages, edition)?
