Fighter Basing Options to Improve Access to Advanced Training Ranges

Fighter Basing Options to Improve Access to Advanced Training Ranges by Bradley DeBlois, published by RAND Corporation in 2021, explores the challenges faced by the U.S. Air Force (USAF) in providing adequate training environments for its fighter pilots. This 78-page report addresses the current limitations in training ranges, which lack the necessary airspace and technological capabilities to simulate advanced adversaries. The authors present an optimization model that evaluates various combinations of range upgrades and potential fighter squadron restationing options to enhance training effectiveness.
Readers will find a detailed analysis of the costs and risks associated with both range modernization and squadron restationing. The report highlights that while upgrading training ranges is essential, it may not be sufficient on its own to ensure adequate access. The findings suggest that restationing options could significantly improve access to upgraded ranges, contingent on institutional flexibility. Additionally, the authors provide insights into the financial implications of these strategies, comparing one-time costs for restationing with long-term expenses of range upgrades. This edition serves as a comprehensive resource for understanding the complexities of military training logistics and the strategic decisions involved.
Official synopsis Publisher
The U.S. Air Force (USAF) has determined that its fighter pilots do not currently have sufficient access to training ranges with airspace, threat emitters, targets, and electronic support measures capable of representing advanced potential adversaries. The USAF is developing a plan to upgrade certain ranges with these capabilities. In addition, the USAF may consider potential fighter squadron restationing options that would improve access to the upgraded training ranges. The authors developed an optimization model to determine the combinations of range upgrades and squadron restationing options that provide the highest levels of effectiveness given different policy constraints. They developed one-time move costs associated with squadron restationing and compared those with preliminary range upgrade cost estimates. Finally, the authors collected data on the risks from natural hazards and power outages for the set of bases and ranges under consideration. The authors found that range upgrades alone might not ensure sufficient access to advanced ranges and that restationing fighter squadrons can provide additional access, but the amount depends on institutional freedom to make restationing decisions. The one-time costs for restationing a fighter squadron and range modernization are on the same order of magnitude, but range upgrades may be substantially more expensive over the long term. The authors recommend that the USAF assess the effectiveness, costs, and risks of restationing presented in this report against other potential solutions for providing access to advanced ranges.
Publisher
Topics
FAQ
What is “Fighter Basing Options to Improve Access to Advanced Training Ranges” about?
Who is the author of “Fighter Basing Options to Improve Access to Advanced Training Ranges”?
When was “Fighter Basing Options to Improve Access to Advanced Training Ranges” published?
What is the ISBN for “Fighter Basing Options to Improve Access to Advanced Training Ranges”?
What are the book details (language, pages, edition)?
