Freedom or Security: The Consequences for Democracies Using Emergency Powers to Fight Terror

Cover of Freedom or Security: The Consequences for Democracies Using Emergency Powers to Fight Terror by Michael Freeman
Publisher: Holtzbrinck
Year: 2003
Language: en
Pages: 232
ISBN-13: 9780275979133
Dimensions:
Height: 9.21 Inches
Length: 6.1401452 Inches
Weight: 1.1243575362 Pounds
Width: 0.5618099 Inches
Dewey Decimal: 323.44
Editorial overview Touché

“Freedom or Security: The Consequences for Democracies Using Emergency Powers to Fight Terror” by Michael Freeman, published by Holtzbrinck on May 30, 2003, explores the complex relationship between emergency powers and civil liberties in democratic societies. This 232-page book examines how several democratic nations have employed emergency measures to combat terrorism, raising critical questions about the impact of such actions on democracy and individual rights.

Freeman analyzes the experiences of four democratic states that have invoked emergency powers, highlighting the potential for both positive and negative outcomes. The book delves into the controversial nature of these powers, addressing the arguments of both proponents and critics. By reflecting on historical contexts, including Great Britain’s approach to Northern Ireland and Canada’s response to the FLQ, readers will gain insights into the delicate balance between security and civil rights in the face of terrorism.


Official synopsis Publisher

Several democratic countries have used emergency powers to restrict or suspend individual liberties in order to fight terrorism more effectively. Emergency powers are controversial in their potential to undermine democracy and civil liberties. Freeman challenges popular arguments of both the supporters of emergency powers, who focus on their expected effectiveness, and the critics, who focus on the dangers. In reality, the recent experiences of four different democratic states that have invoked emergency powers show that a positive outcome is just as likely as negative outcome.

As the United States fights its war against terrorism, it should heed the lessons learned by other democracies in similar struggles, particularly Great Britain’s relationship with Northern Ireland in the 70s and 80s, Uruguay’s response to the Tupamaros in the late 60s and early 70s, Canada’s dealings with the FLQ in 1970, and Peru’s conflict with the Shining Path movement in the 80s and early 90s.

FAQ
What is “Freedom or Security: The Consequences for Democracies Using Emergency Powers to Fight Terror” about?
This page includes the available description and bibliographic details for “Freedom or Security: The Consequences for Democracies Using Emergency Powers to Fight Terror” by Michael Freeman. Synopsis preview: Several democratic countries have used emergency powers to restrict or suspend individual liberties in order to fight terrorism more effectively. Emergency powers are controversial in their potential to undermine democra…
Who is the author of “Freedom or Security: The Consequences for Democracies Using Emergency Powers to Fight Terror”?
“Freedom or Security: The Consequences for Democracies Using Emergency Powers to Fight Terror” is credited to Michael Freeman.
When was “Freedom or Security: The Consequences for Democracies Using Emergency Powers to Fight Terror” published?
Publisher: Holtzbrinck. Year: 2003.
What is the ISBN for “Freedom or Security: The Consequences for Democracies Using Emergency Powers to Fight Terror”?
ISBN-13: 9780275979133.
What are the book details (language, pages, edition)?
Language: en. Pages: 232.

More Books by Michael Freeman

Related Books by Topic